THE UNION Articles on
Planning -- January 2006

Grass Valley to review General Plan tonight, The Union staff, January 31, 2006
Wildwood Ridge to face supervisors
, Trina Kleist, January 28, 2006
Tech Center to bring offices
, Soumitro Sen, January 27, 2006
'Senior Cohousing' author to speak
, The Union staff, January 26, 2006
Public voices concerns about mine reopening
, Brittany Retherford, January 26, 2006
Wildwood vote doesn't address housing concerns, Union editorial, January 21, 2006
Planners approve Wildwood project
, Trina Kleist, January 20, 2006
Planners give thumbs up to RV project
, Trina Kleist, January 18, 2006
Construction update: 13005 Loma Rica Drive, Brittany Retherford, January 17, 2006
Growth causes red ink
, Trina Kleist, January 11, 2006
Construction update on cohousing project
, Brittany Retherford, January 3, 2006


Grass Valley to review General Plan tonight

The Union staff
January 31, 2006

Grass Valley's General Plan is 5 years old - and standing in the way of some projects that developers have slated for land within the city limits.

A public workshop to review the General Plan and discuss changing it will be held at 6 p.m. tonight in council chambers at Grass Valley City Hall.

"We're reviewing the General Plan, the adoption process, the status of it in the five years it's been implemented, talk a little bit about the future vision for the community and allow for some public input," said city community development director Joe Heckel.

The workshop will include a review of the Southhill Village, Loma Rica, Northstar and Kenny Ranch projects and how they conform or fail to conform to the General Plan.

Developers of the Southhill Village project have modified their plans to conform to the General Plan. Developers of the remaining project have said they would like to see changes to the General Plan.

The projects are called special development areas. City staff will explain the projects, the planning process and options for changing the General Plan.

Developers, contractors and skeptics of the projects are expected to attend.


Wildwood Ridge to face supervisors

Trina Kleist, trinak@theunion.com
January 28, 2006

A proposed development near Lake Wildwood would offer more than double the open space originally planned, recreation facilities and a range of housing styles, according to plans approved by the Nevada County Planning Commission.

The Wildwood Ridge Phases 2-4 plan will go before the county Board of Supervisors at 1:45 p.m. Feb. 14. Supervisors will be asked to approve rezoning of the property to increase the open space from about 30 to 80 acres.

Supervisors also will be asked to approve the development agreement reached between planners and Los Angeles-based S&Y Capital Group LLC.

Project architect Lee Iverson of Portland, Ore., said his design strives to take into account the natural surroundings and the needs of the people who would live there.

The plan calls for a large, grassy area along a central swath of the property, cut by trails that would connect to the Phase I area. Much of the open area contains slopes that are too steep for building.

At the center of the development would be a recreation area, which could have a meeting room, picnic areas, barbecue pits and tennis courts. However, the exact location and type of facilities have not been decided.

Four different lot sizes would create diversity by letting people buy in at different price ranges, Iverson said.

When Iverson presented his plans to planning commissioners Jan. 19, he described the residents as retirees zipping along the paved trails in golf carts, baby boomers with time to travel and stroller moms enjoying the mini-parks.

"We've always had the people and natural conditions (of the land) be the driving elements of any development we do," said the architect, who has designed several communities in the Pacific states.

Iverson said his designs emphasize diversity and creating a space that lets them walk, talk and connect to each other. That would create a healthier community where people could visit friends without driving and use their cars less.

ooo

Four types of lots to be offered

Lee Iverson, of Iverson Architects in Portland, Ore., is working with the developer of the Wildwood Ridge Phases 2-4 to design four different types of lots that would be offered on the 206-acre property just north of Lake Wildwood.

• Type A: Seventy-four lots of 5,000 square feet with houses of 1,200 to 2,000 square feet in size. Individual houses would be built in clusters, with fronts facing a common sidewalk or green space. Garage doors would be on the rear, facing a common driveway. Small parks would be arranged within these clusters. Iverson showed samples of cute wood-frame buildings close together.

• Type B: One-hundred-and-twenty-seven lots of 7,000 square feet with houses larger than Type A that would face the street in traditional suburban fashion. Type B lots would be on slightly steeper terrain and surround the clusters of Type A lots. Both are placed at the southern and eastern edges of the development nearest to Lake Wildwood homes, and in the northwestern section. Iverson showed samples of stucco and wood-frame styles that resemble newer homes in suburban California, but with larger front porches.

• Type C: One-hundred-and-thirteen lots of 12,000 or more square feet with larger houses. Iverson compared this area to the Morgan Ranch development, and showed samples with similar architecture. These lots would be on the edge of the Type B areas.

• Type D: Thirty-eight custom lots ranging in size from 0.6 acre to more than 1 acre. These would be built on lots with more steep terrain. These and the Type C lots would, in most areas, be at the edges of the large open spaces planned along the center of the property, buffering the transition from the denser areas of the A and B lots. At a presentation before the county Planning Commission, Iverson showed sample architecture resembling new houses on Banner Mountain, which currently are selling for more than $1 million.

• Low-income and very-low-income units: The plan currently calls for 26 of the existing lots to have a 500-square-foot rental unit built above the garage. Five more smaller lots would have duplexes built instead of single-family homes, to provide 10 additional units for low-income rental housing. Developer Brian Masterman, of S&Y Capital Group LLC, said he would try to find another way to provide more low-income housing with larger living areas.

ooo

To contact staff writer Trina Kleist, e-mail trinak@the union.com or call 477-4231.


Tech Center to bring offices

Earmarked land purchased by property group

By Soumitro Sen, soumitros@theunion.com
January 27, 2006

Nevada City is all set to have a new business park soon.

Twenty years ago, the Grass Valley Group was approved to build its facility on 160 acres of land between Deer Creek School, Seven Hills School and Deer Creek. About half of the property was left unused. Now Campus Property Group has bought the tract, and will build nine office buildings on it - a project that's being called the Nevada City Tech Center.

"There are two reasons (why we have bought the land)," said Robert D. Upton, principal of the Campus Property Group. "One, it's a beautiful piece of property, beautiful trees and lovely rolling terrain. Secondly, the fact that it is already approved - 210,000 square feet - so we don't have to go back through the process. We just have to move forward."

Two local officials predict the project will have a positive economic impact on the area.

"Excellent, high-paying jobs will be attracted to the city and it will continue our focus to be a high-tech center at the foothills," said Laurie Oberholtzer, former mayor and chairperson of the Planning Commission.

According to Sally Harris, a Nevada City city councilor, the sites for the buildings were chosen with care to have the least visual impact on the nearby schools and residential properties.

"The Planning Commission has worked with the developer in terms of placement of the buildings in the property," she said.

"A lot of conditions were placed on it (twenty years ago) which are there today, such as preserving the trees and the requirement for a master plan," Oberholtzer said. "The Grass Valley Group gave (Nevada City) about 100 acres of open space along the Deer Creek. The new subdivision also has about 20 acres of private open space. The result is a very high quality business park. The new owners are implementing the original developing agreement."

"We are talking to three or four parties who are interested (to have their offices in the subdivision)," Upton said. "Our intention is to own the majority of the buildings as a long term investment, but we will sell one or two to owner uses."

ooo

To contact staff writer Soumitro Sen, e-mail soumitros@theunion.com or call 477-4229.


'Senior Cohousing' author to speak

January 26, 2006, The Union staff

The Book Seller will be hosting author and architect Charles Durrett tonight. Durrett will discuss his latest book, "Senior Cohousing: A Community Approach to Independent Living," which presents a compelling alternative to traditional senior housing.

It is a book for people who believe that a supportive community based on proximity and cooperation is the most enriching way to age healthfully. It is for those who believe that humans' social, emotional, physical, and spiritual well-being depends on a balance between privacy and community. This book is not only for seniors but also for younger people working with their parents to find alternatives to traditional retirement homes. The senior cohousing paradigm addresses issues of economy, independence and social health and is for anyone who desires a more invigorating possibility for retirement living.

Durrett has designed over 30 cohousing communities in North America and has consulted on many more around the world. His work has been featured in such publications as Time Magazine, The New York Times and Architecture. In addition to many presentations on cohousing to interested citizen groups, he has spoken before Congress, the Commonwealth Club and scores of universities. Durrett is a resident of Nevada City.

This event will begin at 6:30 p.m., will include a discussion and book signing, and will include refreshments.

Call The Book Seller, at 107 Mill St. in Grass Valley, at 272-2131 for more information.


Public voices concerns about mine reopening

Brittany Retherford
January 26, 2006

Wells sucked dry, increased traffic, mine tailings seeping into Wolf Creek, inadequate housing for 400 new employees and their families.

These are some of the concerns raised by area residents during two Wednesday public workshops on the proposed reopening of the Idaho-Maryland Mine in Grass Valley.

The meeting was held to solicit input from the public in an attempt to be as transparent as possible about a project that, if approved, could have an enormous impact on the area. The city has yet to formally begin its environmental review process - typically the first step in processing a project application, and which evaluates the potential impacts to the surrounding area.

It would be an unusual project - very few gold mines in the country have historically been located within city limits - and of great size for Grass Valley; the proposal calls for about 250,000 square feet of buildings on a 140-acre site.
To ensure that the city's and citizens' concerns both get fully addressed in the process, "specialized expertise" has been hired, said Planning Director Tom Last. The consultants come from a variety of backgrounds, such as Bill Walker, who specializes in mine geochemistry; Thomas Leeman, a wildlife biologist; and Peter Hudson, a geologist, among others.

The team was selected by the city, but Emgold Mining Corp. will foot the bill.

The Canadian mining company hopes to reopen the mine, which was closed in 1956 after 100 years of gold production. Its plan is to mine for gold, turning the residual tailings into ceramic tiles.

The environmental review process will take a detailed look at the potential impacts of the mine - and how Emgold will then "mitigate," or reduce, those impacts.

"We are asking for comments now (on the project) to try to create more opportunity, not less," Last said.

One example is the dewatering of domestic wells.

"I suspect that many of you are here for this specific issue," said a member of the city's consulting team, Jeff Harvey. "We want to make sure there is no loss of high quality water to these existing wells."

During the mid-90s, a proposal was first submitted to dewater the vacated miles of shafts, which now lay beneath the city's limits. Tad Stearn, another member of the city's hired team, said that he has had several residents with wells on their properties express worries that their wells might be sucked dry when the water is pumped out of the shafts.

While the answers and possible solutions to this issue are not available until the environmental review process, Last said these are the types of concerns - and questions - the city hopes to receive about the proposed project.

The next public meeting is slated to occur in June or July.

ooo

To contact staff writer Brittany Retherford, e-mail brittanyr@theunion.com or call 477-4247.

The city of Grass Valley is asking the public for help on identifying issues that should be considered for evaluation as part of the required environmental review process for the proposed Idaho-Maryland Mine project.

Questions or comments should be directed to Tom Last, planning director, at:

• mailing address: 125 East Main St., Grass Valley, 95945; e-mail, toml@cityofgrassvalley.com; phone, 274-4330; or fax, 274-4399.

Concerns should be submitted by Feb. 8.

• Residents should also contact Last if they would like to be included on a mailing list to receive project updates.

• For more information about the project, visit the city's Web site at www.cityofgrassvalley.com. Copies of the application are also available at city hall, at the Grass Valley Library and the Madelyn Helling Library.


Our View: Wildwood vote doesn't address housing concerns

The Union editorial board
January 21, 2006

It doesn't appear that Nevada County has enough interest in providing affordable housing if the Planning Commission's approval of the plans for Wildwood Estates is any indication.

The commission voted 5-0 on Thursday for a 352-home subdivision, which includes 36 affordable "homes" and allows the developer to meet the county's already low threshold of having 10 percent of a project being designated as affordable.

In this case, the affordable housing component includes 26 carriage apartments of 500 square feet. Those tiny apartments will sit on top of the garages of the no-doubt expensive homes that will attract more newcomers and their vehicles to the area.

The other 10 affordable "homes" are duplexes.

Commissioner Bob Jensen of Truckee does agree that the apartments don't meet a decent affordable housing standard, but nonetheless did for the project.

The Planning Commission's approval of this project comes comes nine days after the Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 to forgive nearly $1 million in fees and fines on that 207-acre piece of property near Lake Wildwood. In exchange, the county gets $600,000 in back taxes.

The developer, Los Angeles-based Stone and Youngberg LLC, purchased the property with its delinquent taxes, fees and fines for $10.

The county has been looking for years to unload this property and now it's close to accomplishing its goal.

Unfortunately, it won't benefit many county residents directly unless supervisors reject or modify the current plan and demand real affordable housing opportunities.

On the other hand, a developer has been handed a prime opportunity to take advantage of our sizzling real estate market.

While the developer is complying with the letter of the law on affordable housing, it, as Jensen said, is violating the spirit of the law and it, at the same time, is showing little interest in meeting the needs of those who now live and work here and want to buy a house.

Now it's time the supervisors do the right thing for their constituents and demand real affordable housing in this project.


Planners approve Wildwood project

Conditions regarding affordable housing attached to go-ahead

By Trina Kleist, trinak@theunion.com
January 20, 2006

Nevada County planners approved the Wildwood Ridge project late Thursday, imposing numerous conditions and leaving several aspects to be worked out.

In a series of 5-0 votes, members of the county Planning Commission gave the green light to the environmental impact report, zoning changes, maps, mitigations and permit findings for phases 2 through 4 of the long-delayed luxury development, formerly known as Wildwood Estates.

The approval took 5-1/2 hours, a public hearing and substantial horse-trading among commissioners, neighbors, the owner-developer and engineers.

One of the sticking points that will bring developer J. Brian Masterman back to the commission is affordable housing.

In addition to the 352 units planned, another 36 will be for low-income residents, in accordance with the county General Plan's rule requiring that 10 percent of units be "affordable."

The plans drawn up by Nevada City Engineering called for 26 of those units to be 500-square-foot apartments built over garages. The other 10 were set to be duplexes.

Neighbors in Lake Wildwood protested two-story buildings uphill from their properties. Commissioners expressed concern about the size of the proposed units and the lack of purchase opportunities for working-class families.

"Five-hundred-square-foot affordable housing may meet the letter of the law, but I don't think it meets the spirit," said commissioner Bob Jensen, of Truckee.

Masterman agreed to work on a plan to build more duplexes and fewer garage apartments - the proposal calls them "carriage house units" - but asked the commission's help.

He currently is limited in the number of sewage hook-ups the development can have. To build more duplexes, Masterman said, he would need to buy sewage capacity rights from neighbors, including Lake Wildwood.

If the commissioners gave him approval first, Masterman would have some negotiating power with those willing to sell sewage rights. If his approval hinged on buying sewage rights first, Masterman explained, sellers would be motivated to demand higher prices, making affordable housing unaffordable to the developer.

So he accepted dozens of modifications to the project to meet environmental requirements and satisfy neighbors worried about traffic, distances between buildings, landscaping, fences and access to trails. But he asked commissioners to approve the project without him having to specify how he would handle the affordable housing portion.

"You're asking us to approve this development without really knowing what we're approving as far as the housing," said Commissioner Paul Aguirre of Grass Valley.

"We're asking for flexibility," Masterman said. "It is absolutely our goal to come up with something better than what we have here."

Commissioners also asked him to return with a proposal concerning how long the affordable housing will remain affordable.

Masterman also will provide more detailed plans for drainage and grading, architecture, landscaping, recreational amenities, type of fencing and a legal framework for offering trails in the development to a recreational district, should one be created.

Masterman is president of S&Y Capital Group LLC, based in Los Angeles. The company owns the 206-acre site north of Lake Wildwood. It is a subsidiary of Stone & Youngberg LLC, one of the largest municipal bond underwriters in the state.

ooo

To contact staff writer Trina Kleist, e-mail trinak@theunion.com or call 477-4231.


Planners give thumbs up to RV project

By Trina Kleist, trinak@theunion.com
January 18, 2006

Grass Valley planners voted 4 to 1 late Tuesday to approve plans to build the DeMartini RV Sales project off Idaho-Maryland Road, amid controversy about the facility's appearance and impact on nearby Wolf Creek.

The project includes a building of 22,400 square feet for a recreational vehicle showroom and nine service bays. The building would be surrounded by more than 250,000 square feet of impermeable pavement for storing inventory. Together, the building and pavement would cover nearly half of the 11.8-acre site.

Owners Timothy and Margie DeMartini have been in business in Grass Valley since 1975. They have grown the company into one of the largest RV agencies in the nation, with sales in Grass Valley, Sacramento and Indiana, Timothy DeMartini said.

With yearly sales of about $90 million, the company pays nearly $50,000 monthly in city sales taxes - about 10 percent of the Grass Valley's total sales tax income, DeMartini said.

The project will go before the City Council within 45 days for a final vote.

If approved, DeMartini said, he plans to open for business by this fall on the former quarry site, which can be fully seen from the Golden Center Freeway.

Commissioners and members of the public had mixed responses to the project.

Commissioner Ralph Silberstein, who voted against it, objected to changing the parcel's zoning from being a business park to heavy commercial. He said commercial properties are better located further from the town center.

"Are we going to continue to sacrifice prime areas near the center of town for activities that that don't need to be at the center of town?" Silberstein said.

Resident and professional planner Steve Enos said trees that would be planted on the site would not screen the lot full of recreational vehicles from the view of freeway motorists, as the General Plan requires.

Enos also objected to the architecture. "The Roseville-Highway 80 corridor style of design does not belong in Grass Valley," Enos said.

Commissioner Gloria Hyde praised the owners and developer, Nevada City Engineering, for improving the facade and landscaping. After offering a plain building last year, the DeMartinis on Tuesday brought back a modified plan that gave more texture and style to the facade and increased the pines, cedars and redwoods to be planted.

"I don't want Grass Valley to get into the position where we think every building has to look like a former mining site," Hyde said.

Several members of the public expressed concern about the impact of road improvement on habitat along Wolf Creek. They also worried that rain run-off from the property would increase flooding. Wolf Creek flooded over Idaho-Maryland Road during the New Year's Eve storm, closing the road near the area of the project.

ooo

To contact staff writer Trina Kleist, e-mail trinak@theunion.com or call 477-4231.


Construction update: 13005 Loma Rica Drive

By Brittany Retherford
Staff writer
January 17, 2006

Construction ends today on an 18,000-square-foot tilt-up concrete building at 13005 Loma Rica Drive, across the street from the Nevada County Airport.

The new building will be home to Linda and Gordon Mulay’s growing family business, Electronic Carbide Inc., which will occupy more than 11,000 square feet of the building. The remaining space will be leased to other businesses.

ECI is a precision machine shop that was founded in 1978. It employs more than 20 people and contracts mostly with larger Sacramento and Bay Area companies.

The building itself was designed and constructed by several local companies, including Tru-Line Builders, Nelson Engineering, Daggett Designs, McProud and Associates, Hansen Bros., Nitram Inc., and BP Landscapes. Financing for the project came from Citizens Bank. Construction began on the building in May 2005.


Growth causes red ink

But Grass Valley deficit less than anticipated

by Trina Kleist, trinak@theunion.com
January 11, 2006

Grass Valley city books finished the fiscal year in the red, but the shortfall is less than expected, an independent auditor told City Council members late Tuesday.

The shortfall has been caused in part by growth in areas where the city must provide services, but people aren't fully paying for those services yet, the auditor said.

For the fiscal year 2004-05, the city projected income at $8.56 million, expenses at $10.15 million and a shortfall of $1.59 million.

But a close watch on the money brought an actual income of $8.92 million, expenses of $9.97 million and a shortfall of $1.05 million.

The budget shortfall was nearly $540,000 less than projected.

The fiscal year ended on June 30, 2005.

Mayor Gerard Tassone said after the meeting that city officials "have been struggling to balance the budget without pulling funds from the general fund."

However, growth in the city means the city must provide services to areas that may not immediately pay for those services, said Marilee Smith, of the Yuba City accounting firm Smith and Newell. She headed the independent audit that the city does yearly.

That makes the budget a moving target for planners.

City finance director Carol Fish is working to make the budget "more accurately reflect the cost of doing business," Tassone said. "It takes a few years to do that, especially as you grow. We're still not there yet.

"What we don't want to do is get into this continuous thing where we have to draw on the general fund to balance the budget," Tassone said. The current fiscal year's budget should be even closer, he said.

The less-than-anticipated deficit brought accolades from Smith, who gave the city the highest rating for fiscal management.

"I see a city that is managed very closely, that keeps budgeted expenditures in line," Smith said. "I would like to commend the city on a job well done."

ooo

To contact staff writer Trina Kleist, e-mail trinak@theunion.com or call 477-4231.


Construction update on cohousing project

By Brittany Retherford
January 3, 2006

The first residents of the new Nevada City cohousing project on Chief Kelly Drive and West Broad Street moved into their new homes in mid-December, reported architect Chuck Durrett of McCamant and Durrett Architects recently. Since then, at least four other families have moved in, and a second group is anticipated to begin arriving Jan. 13.

The project, which received approval from Nevada City more than two years ago, has been under construction and is still not yet complete. The plan boasts a common house, swimming pool and communal gardens and trails, along with 34 affordable units with an average home price of about $310,000, Durrett said.

"We told these residents what these prices were going to be three years ago, and we were able to stay at that price," he said.

The common house is not slated to be finished until mid-January, he said. A grand opening is planned to celebrate the final completion of the project, which is anticipated to be in February.

There have been some delays in the project, which Durrett attributed to weather.

- Brittany Retherford



Top of Articles Home Page